|
Originally Posted by Megalixir
I still think it isn't worth it. A controller for two games and only two games. The same could be said about Guitar Hero, which is a game I can't understand why people like.
|
Steel Battalion.
Also worth every fucking penny of the 200 I shelled out for it. If the game that requires the controller is
that good, shelling out the extra scratch for the required peripheral isn't a bad thing. I've bought all sorts of special controllers for stuff. In many cases, it improves the game SO MUCH that the price point is compeltely justified.
Double Post:
|
Originally Posted by JackyBoy
HALO. A great game that yes was very successful however, had HALO been released for Gamecube it likely would have been much better received in general. The dislike those who had for this title seemed to have stemmed more from the fact that it appeared for the Xbox. The game may have had some faults but in the sea that is FPS's, it's a damn fine shooter. HALO is an example where people negatively judge a game based on the console it's released for.
|
Some people have legitimate beefs with HALO, you know. I can't stand the attrocious level design of the second game and the multiplayer, and the first game's recycling of some levels was not something I enjoyed. I actually hate the second one wish a passion, but it sure as shit isn't because it appeared on the Xbox.
Jam it back in, in the dark.