Nov 9, 2006, 04:42 AM
Local time: Nov 9, 2006, 07:42 PM
|
#1 of 50
|
The ugliest bits of Wikipedia are the ideology topics. The software basically relies on people to stake out their ideological turf in order to get a comprehensive article on the subject. And a fairly comprehensive article gets made, but the rates at which these are revised, copyedited, factchecked, organised, have certain language modified for a neutral point of view, etc. takes fuckloads longer, because the Zionists/Marxists/LaRouche cultists/Anarcho-capitalists form these faggy cabals and MONITOR EVERY SINGLE CHANGE 24/7.
I swear, genuine internal editing on Wikipedia really becomes a case of '4chan with table manners' sometimes.
If you're after the GDP of Latvia or the PM of Malaysia, go ahead. But think very fucking carefully before you take anything on the 'iffier' sections as a given.
Jam it back in, in the dark.
LlooooydGEEEOOORGE
Last edited by Cal; Nov 9, 2006 at 04:45 AM.
|
Cal