The Philosophy of Drunk Driving

Originally Posted by Bradylama

Yes, reaction times do help accident avoidance, but it also doesn't mean that the intoxicated are incapable of reacting to and avoiding a possible accident.

This thing you're doing. Stop it. No, don't argue, just stop it right now.

why it doesn't seem to occur to you that drunks avoid accidents by chance, I don't know.

How ya doing, buddy?

Originally Posted by Bradylama

I didn't notice anything in the report that hinted at their methodology, unless you expect me to root through thirty different studies.

Considering you had questions about their methodology, what they controlled for etc yes you are expected to look past the abstract first. Unless you're in the 'google is hard' camp.

stop doing this thing that which you are doing

There's nowhere I can't reach.

Originally Posted by Bradylama

Because possessing a blood alcohol content above a .08 does not make one a reckless driver. I can only repeat this so many times before I wonder if any of you are listening. BAC can only ever raise the likelihood of one being a danger to others, it doesn't act as a guarantee.

People who are hot for child porn are at a greater degree of becoming future kiddy-touchers, although it's not a guarentee.

You need to stop this now. I don't know what you think you're doing, but it needs to be put out of its misery.

Additional Spam:

Originally Posted by Bradylama

I guess my time is too precious to research for other people's arguments. How will internet debate survive this!?

Your time is too precious to read a study or two, but you have enough time to raise a tempest in a teacup over the tyranny of drunk driving laws.

I keep telling you to stop why aren't you listening to me. I only have your best interests in mind, now that it's obvious you're operating under the influence of hysterics.

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.

This is exactly what I'm talking about. You need to stop this, Brady, for our sake as well as your own. It's gone well beyond appearances. People are starting to notice, I don't think that's something you want.

I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body?

No, you still would. that's the only explanation I can think of when someone makes a thread proposing dropping drunk driving laws and then insist that everyone around you comes up with evidence that you then ignore.

I don't know what crawled into the vag and I dont' want to know, so just stop this

I was speaking idiomatically.

Did you point out any studies that defends the point you have made? I looked over your posts, but all I saw was cockamime bullshit retoric coming from you alone.

That you defend your laziness with 'I question the validity of these studies, but that's all the effort I make' is fooling exactly no one. I can't understand why you don't listen when you're being talked to.

Most amazing jew boots

Quote:

I shouldn't need a study to illustrate that probabilities are not guarantees

No, but you damn well better back up your claims when you suggest getting rid / severely overhauling a whole country's worth of traffic laws on the basis of pedantic nitpicking.

FELIPE NO

perhaps such studies don't exist because the evidence is overwhelmingly against them. Why doesn't this tip you off?

I figured it out. I told you to stop it, you wouldn't listen, and now I'm on to you.

You're a fucking terrorist.

Between getting rid of the drunk driving laws and advocating a return of the gold standard (sup depressions) you want to destroy America.

get the fuck out hajj

What, you don't want my bikini-clad body?