|
Originally Posted by Firefly
Is it in debatable taste? Yes.
The problem, in my opinion, is that people have lost track of an important distinction: he was not found guilty. The civil suit should've been thrown out due to double jeopardy - logically, how can someone be 'not guilty of' and 'liable for' the same offense?
|
Legal language have very precise definitions. It's obvious due to reality (that is, that the civil suit was
not thrown out of court) that you don't know what you're talking about.
I don't know what's
debatable about the taste of murder what-ifs, personally.
Double Post:
|
Originally Posted by Tuxedo-Templar
Heh. I'll enjoy watching people flip over this. The irony of knowing that the millions of people starving and killing each other around the world carries less weight than some cocky black guy ATTN whoring is amusing enough.
|
Are you trying to feel superior than everyone else by being amused that inhuman conditions are going
ignored?
Most amazing jew boots
85242
35212
Sarag