|
I guess my point is that it's not healthy for a nation's first response to calamity to be one of suspicion and cultural animosity. The proper response is "What a shame.", not "Which cowardly bunch of sand-niggers did it this time?"
|
I would argue that it is
not the nation's first response towards a catastrophe of this magnitude. However, it would be
Homeland Security's first response, and their job is to make sure everyone knows that they're working so they talk about what isn't terrorism a lot.
I mean, the nation can do several things at once. It's pretty big.
Additional Spam:
|
Not really, and not really. I know it's a tragedy, but seven people is a lot better than it could have been. Frankly, I was surprised it wasn't much more.
|
you all know that that isn't seven people dead, that's seven people
confirmed dead, right? There's a couple of dozen people left unaccounted for and probably dead.
Yes, I know it's 1/100th of a 9/11 and thus unworthy of taking up more time than, say, the loss of Paris Hilton's inheritance, but can we keep the jaded musings of an entertainment-news industrial complex gone
mad with stupid news stories that only affect white people to at minimum two or
three days after the event? Jesus christ.
Additional Spam:
|
It was either shoddy engineering (most likely) or the culmination of 40 years of weather fluctuations from bitter cold winters to hot-as-fuck summers. (far-fetched but still theoretically possible)
|
I'm not an engineer, but I imagine that an interstate bridge constructed with shoddy engineering would not have stood for forty years and, even recently, did not show any signs of significant structural damage. But I did hear that it was deemed structurally deficient a few years back, I'm not saying it's superbridge or wasn't in need of repairs.
Jam it back in, in the dark.