 85242 |
 35212 |
|
|
||
|
|
|||||||
| Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis. |
|
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).
|
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Chocobo
 Member 7460 Level 12.76 May 2006 
|
Not exactly the issue that was initially presented but what do you guys think about this?
ht tp://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/1992/1992rcs2-321/1992rcs2-321 .html (Take out the spaces, I'm not allowed to post urls yet...) It's basically explaining that insurance companies have the right to discriminate based on age, gender and marriage status. To me, a male, it does seem unfair. Is it truely okay to generalize that all males are worse drivers due to the statistics generated by other male drivers? Using this logic, it seems logical to do things like (this is just a stereotypical example and is not meant to be offensive to anyone): Since it is statistically shown that asians smarter, they should instantly be given preference in university selections or since it is statistically shown that certain races are more prone to crime, we should instantly suspect members of that race in that area. To me a more fair look at insurance would be equal initial rates and the drivers be given rates based on their records, merits and their driving. (Such as a sit-in driving session) I dunno, I thought i'd just bring it up. Jam it back in, in the dark. |
BlueEdge