|
Hmmmm.
I once obtained an invitation to OiNK in an attempt to acquire a better filesharing source. However, I found much of the OiNK community to be elitists and their standards absurdly stringent. It seemed that in order to download anything from OiNK, you first had to upload or make available twice as much. And heaven forbid you have basic procedural questions; their FAQs seemed quite unforgiving of people who weren't already experts at creating torrents.
I spent a week reading through the OiNK guides, lurking and studying the patterns of established users. In the end, I didn't like what I saw, an elite cadre of audiophiles who cast a disapproving glare at the music community from within the high walls of their precious, precious ivory tower. Yes, OiNK was a good site for acquiring high quality albums at the earliest moment of opportunity, but the internet benefits from trickle-down theory like nothing else can; I could wait.
I'm not truly sad to see OiNK go. Their place will be assumed by another cackling heap of elitists, I'm sure. But I'm amused by the fervent attempts by Interpol and others to put the damper on technological progress. Eventually, the music industry will understand that technology has outmoded 90% of their business practices. Until then, I'll just continue laughing.
|
I couldn't agree more with what you said about OiNK. I don't think I've seen a private music sharing site with such ridiculous standards. Only super nerds really understand most of their particular guidelines. It was especially pathetic how everyone clung onto every little scrap they could find to seed as well. I can't say I'm sad to see it go, either. It's true that the music industry's crackdown seems futile at times, but I wonder how hard they'll try to cling onto their piece of the pie and what other tactics they'll deploy.
Jam it back in, in the dark.