HAY GUYS

**RacinReaver** · Local time: Jun 30, 2006, 10:26 PM

Originally Posted by packrat

How small must something be for it to be considered "nano?" If you are referring to circuitry, then shouldn't we be calling modern computers nanotechnology? If not that, then is it dependent upon the scale of the devices itself?

Umm...modern computers quite certainly do involve plenty of nanotechnology. =\

Jam it back in, in the dark.

**RacinReaver** · Local time: Jul 6, 2006, 05:00 PM

Originally Posted by packrat

Well, my point is that people aren't going around calling computers(or the individual chips) products of nanotechnology, unless they incorporate devices or techniques particularly unique to the scale, such as MEMS.(at least in my experience)

That would actually be NEMS if you want it to be nanotechnology. >.>

There's nowhere I can't reach.