|
Well hey, let's say he was on 4chan's /b/ and some asshole posts child porn. Guy happens to be from Arizona. Is it fair that he should go to jail b/c some asshole in New Guinea or whatever posts some pictures and a thumnail of it goes into his cash? You go to jail b/c anonymous is a pedo asshole and you happened to live in Arizona? That's fair?
|
I imagine the feds have become familiar with places that tend to have those sorts of things spammed on them even though they're illegal and they probably won't hold it against the people who most likely viewed the image without the intent to.
Additional Spam:
Actually, I was curious, and tried to look at how likely someone is to commit another sexual-based offense.
|
Originally Posted by http://www.csom.org/pubs/recidsexof.html
* Incest offenders ranged between 4 and 10 percent.
* Rapists ranged between 7 and 35 percent.
* Child molesters with female victims ranged between 10 and 29 percent.
* Child molesters with male victims ranged between 13 and 40 percent.
* Exhibitionists ranged between 41 and 71 percent.
--------
Several studies support the hypothesis that sexual offense recidivism rates are underreported. Marshall and Barbaree (1990) compared official records of a sample of sex offenders with "unofficial" sources of data. They found that the number of subsequent sex offenses revealed through unofficial sources was 2.4 times higher than the number that was recorded in official reports.
|
And on and on with more junk. Not really posting that aimed at you rit, just posting it for general information for people reading the thread.
Also, I imagine that guy that went and killed the two sex offenders could have just looked in court records for a trial involving a sex offender, and used any of the internet lookup services to find out where they were currently living and done the same thing.
I was speaking idiomatically.