Maximum signature dimensions

Elxir, I don't know what you're talking about with the donating money for increased sig sizes, since the people who wind up paying for the massive sigs is everyone download. Lots of people use imageshack and other sites to host their images, so it's not like there's tons of bandwidth that's being saved at GFF.

Also, I had remembered the image limit being placed long long ago to stop people from having shitloads of stupid looking pictures in their signatures. Personally, for a sig like eleo's where it combined to make one big one, that's fine. But I don't need 20 little unrelated 25x25 squares telling me about all of your interests.

Jam it back in, in the dark.

Originally Posted by AcerBandit

So let's just say I decided to get rid of my signature and just post the signature code everytime I post. Would I have to abide by the sigpic rules then? Is it suddenly spam? There are people who sign their posts with their name all the time and they don't get warnings or anything. I see that as almost the same thing.

Actually, we used to have people that would attach random files to their posts, attach an extra signature image before the signature, or post a random picture at the end of every post. In each case, they were warned and told to stop (which they did).

There's nowhere I can't reach.

The opening post in the thread says 50kb.

I also like how pang totally missed the timestamp on Elixir's post while making fun of him for replying to an old post.

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.

It's not true, as far as I remember it was just people wishing the limit had been increased so that's what they all decided to assume.

I haven't been killing sigs recently because for some reason firefox doesn't report image sizes properly when I look at their properties. =/

How ya doing, buddy?

(For now...)

*dramatic chord*

I was speaking idiomatically.

I think it should be fine.

What kind of toxic man-thing is happening now?