 85242 |
 35212 |
|
|
||
|
|
|||||||
| Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis. |
|
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).
|
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Chocorific
 Member 6745 Level 38.97 May 2006 
|
Have you tried ImgBurn (its some sort of fork from the burning engine of DVD Decrypter)?
Most amazing jew boots |
|
Chocorific
Member 6745 Level 38.97 May 2006
|
I forgot to ask: How fast are you burning the media? From my experience even the 16x-certified media perform very poor when burned at full speed (you clearly see this when running a PI/PO check - with kprobe e.g.). I always burn my media using the lowest speed write strategy that is embedded in the disc (for my current verbatim that is 6x - produces really low PI and nearly no-existant PO-values).
Another example: A friend of mine was burning his media using the maximum speed his burner and the media was capable - that is 8x. Most of the media weren't accepted in his dvd-standalone. He didn't know about how to do a surface check so i kprobe-checked the burned medias in my drive and the values were horribly high. Reducing the speed to 4x did the trick, the values returned to quite good quality (here and there some spikes - but nothing to worry about) and all the discs he burned after that did fine in the stand-alone. EDIT: You could try checking the image files with pcsx2. Maybe the images are already bad. There's nowhere I can't reach.
Last edited by LiquidAcid; Jul 18, 2006 at 05:11 PM.
|
LiquidAcid