|
Originally Posted by Rock
Defragmenting your HDD is overrated, anyway.
|
Well thats your opinion and I certainly don't share this one.
|
Originally Posted by Rock
At least with an NTFS file system and a fairly recent drive model, you won't experience any noticable slowdown due to a fragmented disk. Defragmenting once every three or four months is more than enough, even if you have a large > 250 GB partition/disk.
|
They even say this about reiserfs, reiser4 and some of the even more advanced file systems in the unix area. But the fact is that even these filesystem fragment and if you reach a fragmentation degree somewhere around 50% you will experience some performance loss (and I want to emphasize: ntfs isn't really advanced...).
I won't elaborate more on that, because everyone has to decide on his own if it's worth the time to defragment the filesystem. if you get you perf back by defragmentation then be happy, it not...search somewhere else for the bottleneck (at least I always get back my speed - often working with lots of tiny files)
|
Originally Posted by Rock
I also doubt the positive effect of small partitions. It's entirely subjective, but I like to have my data organized in one partition on a single drive (I'm even using a 320 GB one at the moment). Organization is a moot argument, because you can use folders to achieve the same effect while not having to worry about partition space.
|
To me its also a 'security reason'. I like my data being more 'physically' separated than only through a structure in the filesystem. Maybe it's also because I'm a linux guy - I unmount everything that is currently no in use, and you can do this best if you've separate partitions.
Most amazing jew boots