|
Originally Posted by OmagnusPrime
And no, "pointing out that review scores are less important than descriptive appraisals" is in no way controversial, but that's not the point I'm picking up on. Right now you seem to be making a snap decision about the quality of Edge's and Famitsu's reviews based on an arbitary score assigned that you've indicated numerous times now that you don't put any faith in.
|
|
Quote:
So tell me, if you can't really judge the quality of the game on the review score, why is it you can cast doubts on the quality of the review?
|
I opined that either games have seen a massive leap in relative quality over the past few years, or reviewers' standards are slipping. I believe the latter, but I'm not going to push that. It wasn't so much a snap decision as it was voicing concern for the way they've both been assessing new releases lately—I've not dismissed either review completely, but that a nebulous, arbitrary score is readily available and the text accompanying it is not is another frustrating part of this, and a damning indicator of the state of games journalism as a whole.
I'll hold off on passing judgement on whether or not Edge's review is worth heeding until I've read the full thing. Shall probably buy the issue tonight in light of all this. tl;dr: I am skeptical about the review because Famitsu and Edge seem to have lowered their standards in recent years, but I'm reserving judgement.
|
Originally Posted by Shin
I'd love to know which other game to have got a ten from Edge you thought didn't deserve it, Krel.
|
Halo 3 and Littlebigplanet are the only two I don't agree with (although, that said, Q pointed out in chat that Edge's reasons for giving Halo that score were better laid out than those of most other review outlets).
I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body?