Don't mess with Paine.
Since the Constitution is mostly a agreement between the States and the Federal Government. (To form a more perfect Union) The Bill of Rights does not give legal rights to the People. Nor is it suppose to. Rather it's meant to recognize the natural rights of the People. Which is why the US Constitution is considered a social contract. Gun ownership being one of those natural rights.
Tom Paine on why the Bill of Rights doesn't give you any legal rights.
|
Originally Posted by Rights of Man
It is a perversion of terms to say that a charter gives rights. It operates by a contrary effect — that of taking rights away. Rights are inherently in all the inhabitants; but charters, by annulling those rights, in the majority, leave the right, by exclusion, in the hands of a few. ... They...consequently are instruments of injustice.
|
In other words, if you interpret that the bill of rights is giving us constitutional rights, a privilege is being created. Which can
always be negotiated. Natural rights are non-negotiable. They do not fade in the face of oppression or disappear in the midst of tyranny. To make this issue about personal security is laughable or downright pathetic. Though I suppose the Supreme Court was just trying to dodge some legal bullets.
Jam it back in, in the dark.