Port Security

Originally Posted by Arainach

Someone explain this one to me. I'd love to hear it.

Okay, I'm game.

Where do you propose we get $92 billion dollars? Especially, in light of the fact that in order to maintain the national debt ceiling, the federal pensions program had to be dipped into? Do you know how serious that is?

Jam it back in, in the dark.

Originally Posted by Arainach

The BILL was $92 billion. And it passed, by the way. The Amendment was $3 billion.

I'm talking about the bill.

There's nowhere I can't reach.

Originally Posted by Arainach

Then complain to your representative. None of them know what fiscal responsibility is. I fail to see how it has any relevance whatsoever to this thread.

Cute. You also fail to see how serious things are that the government is forced to siphon off funds from federal pensions to pay for the bare minimum. The relevancy to this thread is; where can the government cough up an extra three billion when security's been fine, except in the election year pandering department? Maybe we should dip into social security to pay for that amendment?

How does it feel to be a tool of the liberal agenda?

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.

Originally Posted by Lord Styphon

Was this attack really necessary?

It was not intended to be an attack. More of a clarification on my "election year pandering" statement.

Apologies if you took it otherwise Arainach.

I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body?