 85242 |
 35212 |
|
|
||
|
|
|||||||
| Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis. |
|
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).
|
| View Poll Results: Is the current definition of "professional VGM composer" acceptable? | |||
| Yes |
  
|
3 | 15.00% |
| No; use some other fixed number |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| No; use discretion |
  
|
15 | 75.00% |
| Other |
  
|
2 | 10.00% |
| Abstain/Don't care |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 20. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
 Member 632 Level 40.53 Mar 2006 
|
Again, I think only VGM/arrangements should show up, regardless of composer, so I vote "other".
In any case, this one's a headache to sort out, since its' on a one-by-one basis. You're stepping into shaky grounds if you allow one composer and not another (the Sakamoto vs the Super Sweep comparison above is a good example). But thems the breaks with discretion. I can't think of too many composers that can be abused like this though, but that's just off the top of my head. I'm sure they're out there... Jam it back in, in the dark.
I'm taking over this town...
I'm screaming for vengenace... I'm shouting at the devil... I'm not dead and I'm not for sale... Ain't lookin' for nothin' but a good time...
Last edited by Golfdish from Hell; Jun 19, 2007 at 02:39 AM.
|
Golfdish from Hell