Gamingforce Interactive Forums
85240 35212

Go Back   Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis > Garrmondo Entertainment > Media Centre
Register FAQ GFWiki Community Donate Arcade ChocoJournal Calendar

Notices

Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis.
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).


[Movie] Star Trek (2009)
Reply
 
Thread Tools
nuttyturnip
Soggy


Member 601

Level 52.11

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old May 9, 2009, 10:32 PM #1 of 151
I saw the film this morning, and Araes has summed it up best. It's a decent movie for casual viewers, but there are just way too many flaws.
Pros:
-Zachary Quinto made an excellent Spock.
-Simon Pegg, though a bit over the top for Scotty, was still enjoyable.
-Fitting in an awesome number of classic Trek cliches.

Cons and Plot Holes:
-Why is Kirk's wife on the Kelvin? Families, especially pregnant members, weren't aboard starships until TNG.
-Why is all of Starfleet in some other sector, and why does the Federation staff all the remaining ships (including their flagship) seemingly completely with newly graduated cadets?
-The whole having to stand still to beam up thing. Standing still 5 seconds in the confinement beam is completely bogus. Just have Amanda crushed by a rock if you're that set on killing her.
-Correct me if I'm wrong, but stopping a supernova by creating a black hole is insanely stupid. Wouldn't a black hole be much worse, what with radiation emissions and immense gravitation pull?
-Promoting Cadet Kirk all the way to Captain at the end, meanwhile Spock gets nothing.

Impression:
Would it have been that hard to write a sequel without completely invalidating just about the entire Star Trek universe (except for Enterprise)? When Amanda died and Vulcan blew up, I kept expecting some time travel mumbo-jumbo to put everything back the way it was supposed to be, but instead they blow up the Romulan ship and "The End". At least Captain Pike doesn't end in a beeping chair for the rest of his life (at least not yet).


Jam it back in, in the dark.
nuttyturnip
Soggy


Member 601

Level 52.11

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old May 10, 2009, 12:32 AM #2 of 151
Also, Nutty, you are giving Trekkies a bad name, and that is some feat.
How am I doing that? Contrary to how my post might have looked, I actually did enjoy the movie, it just could have been much better.

Oh, and Dopefish reminded me of how much I hated the Uhura thing.

There's nowhere I can't reach.
nuttyturnip
Soggy


Member 601

Level 52.11

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old May 11, 2009, 10:49 AM 1 1 #3 of 151
Ok, I just found out that Tyler Perry was in the movie. I'm downgrading my opinion accordingly.

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.
Reply


Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis > Garrmondo Entertainment > Media Centre > [Movie] Star Trek (2009)

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[General Discussion] Don't Buy the Hype Bradylama Video Gaming 11 Feb 15, 2007 11:48 PM
Shining Force EXA Gechmir Video Gaming 20 Aug 4, 2006 07:27 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.