 85242 |
 35212 |
|
|
||
|
|
|||||||
| Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis. |
|
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).
|
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
 Member 600 Level 38.35 Mar 2006 
|
LeHah hates people. He's said it about a million times now, guys. Is it really so shocking that he doesn't see the inanity in spending $39 million on three elephants?
Jam it back in, in the dark.  |
Member 600 Level 38.35 Mar 2006
|
Basically anyone who disagrees with you is stupid, LeHah. You so predictably pull out that trump card every time, and it's getting old.
I could do a sweeping poll of five-year-olds and they'd all agree that spending this kind of money on elephants when there are much worthier causes (involving humans) is preposterous. It doesn't take a genius to figure that one out. There's nowhere I can't reach. |
Member 600 Level 38.35 Mar 2006
|
OK, switching gears.
The article said that one of the main reasons for the debate was because elephants kept in captivity aren't healthy. It even cited specific examples, such as captive elephants living much shorter lives and developing conditions like arthritis due to not being able to roam freely. Given that information, do you still think this was a smart decision? This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it. |
Alice