|
And your last point is just absurd. I can't imagine any nation or society would deal with a "catastrophic collapse" well, seeing as how it would be cata-fucking-strophic.
|
Not really. Germany dealt pretty well with their economy collapsing under hyper-inflation in the '30s and that was catastrophic. Japan bounced back ok after having two major cities wiped off the planet in WW2 which some would probably describe as a catastrophy. Possibly I was using slightly over the top language but that doesn't make my point any less valid. Look at New Orleans for example. A city built below sea level in a region prone to storms gets hit by a storm then floods and people start raping and murdering each other. What's going to happen when one of the big cities built on a fault line gets hit by a big earthquake? Everyone's going to calmly leave, roll with the changes and carry on elsewhere? Of course not, it'll look like a warzone and given the proliferation of firearms, will possibly become an actual warzone. The kind of localised chaos caused by what cannot be callled anything other than a catastrophic event in a single city, magnified up to a national level in the event of a proper economic collapse and failure of government represents, I would say, the end of your country as you know it.
Now I'm not suggesting that a similar event in any other major city wouldn't result in a similar situation. Should the Thames barrier fail and London get flooded, I'm sure it would be chaotic for a while and given our country's terrible infrastructure for these kinds of things, it'd take years to get over it but I honestly believe you'd see more of people helping each other out than you would of people shooting each other to defend the sodden patch of earth they used to call a house and at the end of it all, there would still be an infrastructure and everything woudl eventually get back to normal.
Obviously I don't know all the ins and outs of every facet of American life and business or whatever, I can only comment on what I know from news reports and opinion (Which I get from a rather less devisive source than you I'd wager) and when you see how much people were bitching when the price of petrol went up a bit last year, I can only imagine what would happen if the petrol just stopped.
And we've actually had that situation here a few years ago when the fuel depots were all blockaded. Sure it was annoying but life pretty much carried on. People just didn't drive, they got on trains or worked from home and there were certainly no fights at petrol stations or any of that nonsense.
I just really think you're over-estimating the ability of the majority of Americans to adapt to even the slightest change, let alone something as fundamental as a life without oil.
There's nowhere I can't reach.