|
I have to wonder though, if they're not making the movie for anime fans, then who is the their target audience? If its people who never heard of Bebop in the first place, why not just make something original that's inspired by Bebop instead? Like Shin said, we're not the target market, so why bother going to all that trouble and money to buy the licence? Its not like they waltz into Sunrise and immediatly get the rights, it must have been alot of work and money.
I just find it a little hard to believe that so much paperwork and money was used just so people who never heard of Bebop can see a live action version of it, and the anime fanbase is not even considered to be a tiny fraction of their market.
People would say "well that's cause they wanna show Bebop to a broader audience!". Ok, fine, but what is the point of adapting Bebop if in the end, it doesn't look or sound like it? Might as well make something original, cause we all know Hollywood needs it.
The difference between LOTR and this is that, LOTR never really had a major visual representation except a few cartoons, so they came up with music and the looks on their own and it was good. But Bebop already has a visual and audio representation, which makes me wonder why bother at all if they don't intend on using the music and similar designs. If anything, this saves companies alot of money since it already exists.
Its like when games get made into anime and they use the game soundtracks. Air, Kanon, Clannad, and Tales of Abyss did that.
Of course this is still tentative, maybe they will get Kanno back and the design of the film will be just like the show. Who knows?
|
They won't be abandoning the look and sound of the anime, they'll be following it, just not to the extent that a hardcore fan (i.e. someone who knows the name of the original composer) would want it. People here are suggesting that getting in a different composer will mean it's nothing like the cartoons but that's because they know the original so well. To someone like me who's seen a couple of episodes however, it's likely they can get close enough to the sound for me to not tell the difference or have my experience of the eventual movie lessened any. Likewise, if you're an ardent fan of the cartoons, I imagine that Keanu Reeves looks nothing like the dude but again, if memory serves the protagonist is a dude with black hair and an 80's haircut, I'm sure Keanu can manage that.
See?
I'm not suggesting that this will be a film aimed at people who've never ever heard of the show as that would be stupid but rather, they're trying to appeal to casual observers who are aware of the programme in a pretty vague sense and might be interested in seeing what it would be like as a Hollywood blockbuster, possibly because they're not overly interested in episodic animes.
Comparing this to companies making animes out of computer games is silly too because the market for both is pretty similar. People who play a lot of Japanese computer games, I would suggest are going to be into animes. The people making the animes are aiming the product at the games players and as such, they're going to try to stick as closely to the original source material as possible. If this film was going to be a low budget indy release then it would more than likely try to ape the cartoons as closely as possible as they'd make more money from getting every fan of the cartoon to watch it then they would from trying to drag in newcomers. As it is, it's a high budget Hollywood effort and they simply wouldn't make enough money from the original fanbase to cover costs, hence why they're going for wider market appeal.
I was speaking idiomatically.