|
So I am supposed to sift through your bullshit "framing" and find the real argument deep inside? Please. I read your argument how anyone else is going to read it, as a sarcastic, weak and unfunny swipe at Nintendo. I'm not taking issue with what you're saying, I'm taking issue with how your saying or "framing" it.
|
I'm sorry, I shall take the time out to read through your posting history to see how I
should be posting then. Ah, I see the trick is to limit oneself to no more than a single sentence in a post whenever possible. I'm sure that would make my points easier to understand, thank you for enlightening me.
|
Quote:
Nintendo is targetting the market it always has AND more. It's opened the door for other gamers to walk on through, while still making games for gamers who have remained loyal.
|
Two things here really. The market they've always had has been collapsing since the N64. Each generation sees them lose more and more market share so it would seem that "Sticking with what we know" is a losing strategy. I never said that they've not brought in new customers, what I suggested is that these new customers don't buy many games each. And then again, look you said people who remained loyal. You mean people who fell for the marketing tricks and have an irrational sense of brand loyalty right? Well fervent as Ninty's fanboys are (And you're a damn good example, not quite RABicle but not bad at all), there aren't enough of them to keep the Wii profitable. The very point I've been trying to make, is that yes, Nintendo do diligently re-release Mario and Smash Brothers and Zelda every couple of years and the brainwashed "Loyal" customers lap it up and buy every new version and now a lot of people have bought a Wii for a bit of Wii Sports action but if this is as ambitious as Nintendo get, then they will only see further reduction of their market share as their competitors manage to launch a much bigger range of products and as such cater to the mass market (Where all the money is). You imply that every Xbox game is a bland shooter or driving game but there's a reason for that, it makes them a shit load of cash and the whole point of my arguement this whole time, had you done me the courtesy of actually reading any of it instead of frothing at the mouth and going into defend the motherland mode on me, was that financially, Nintendo need to grab a slice of the mass-market pie otherwise they're going to struggle to maintain the Wii as a commercial product.
|
Quote:
Nintendo has created games (or some on the way) on the Wii for almost all of it's major series, Mario, Zelda, Smash Bros., Metroid, Fire Emblem, Nintendo's Wars Series, Kirby, Animal Crossing, Wario and the numerous spin-off titles like Paper Mario, Mario Kart and the Mario Sports & Party titles. There's not too many more series that I can think of that need representation, maybe F-Zero and Star Fox. It's just now they're offering more.
|
Or in other words, Nintendo has made the same nine games over and over again for the past few years and of those, Animal Crossing is hardly mass market and a big money spinner.
|
Quote:
Again, I'm not taking issue with your argument. Although I don't agree with it, it's all about your "framing".
Ugh, you keep asking the same question over and over and I'm afraid I'm going to answer you with basically the same answer. You posted like a child, I responded to you as a child. If you had posted a coherent post, I would have given you a coherent reply.
You can't just turn around and say "Hey, if you think I'm bad, why are you doing the same?" Did you think about why I responded to you like that? No.
|
Sorry Captain Eloquent, I addressed this already though. One liners in future. Gotcha.
|
Quote:
Because you want Nintendo to change their market strategy based on what YOU want and WHAT you desire, when you have clearly stated that you have all the real gaming you need on other systems. That's stupid and narrow-minded. Wii doesn't always suit your needs, but another system does, move on and stop whining. Why have 3 identical consoles? Why shoot at the same goal?
Nintendo offers something different and panders to the same hardcore crowd it always has. I don't see how this is a bad target strategy. It's selling. It's working.
|
Aside from that it's not working, I guess I can't argue with that. You're right, Nintendo should stick to making lifestyle games and kids games and just keep rehashing their main titles for the "Hardcore" gamers who stuck by Nintendo through thick and thin because the ad-men told them to. Bravo.
I can't imagine your fanboy rage will even dent in the face of mere reason and logic so I think it's best if I remove myself from this discussion now, especially as Skills can't ban me from it and I don't want to be accused of feeding the trolls, or indeed the fanboys.
You win this time Captain Nintendo!
What, you don't want my bikini-clad body?