In a film where they didn't do much actual acting and spent most of the film practicing their moody glares, I think so. I guess the only way you'd ever know would be, you know, to actually watch the film rather than dismiss it out of hand because you have this weird, tenth grade film studies student opinion that films are there to be disseminated and poked at rather then watched and enjoyed. I'll bet you're one of those people who says that the Rob Zombie version of Halloween takes away all the suspense and tension of the film by revealing a bit about the character and having people actually get killed once in a while as opposed to anyone who's watched the original Halloween recently and realised that the majority of the film is Mike Myers shuffling around outside the school in broad daylight like a third rate WWE wrestler, looking more like a particularly unsubtle paedophile than a knife wielding psychopath. I'm not saying that the remake of Omen was a masterpiece, not by any stretch of the imagination but it is a decent film that brings the now-dated original up to pace. The Omen was never a really scary film and at least the remake injects a couple of shocks, even if you don't get to watch Gregory Peck looking a bit lost and constipated throughout proceedings.
Additional Spam:
|
I'm with LeHah on this one. The Omen remake was terrible. Liev Schreiber and Julia Stiles turn in pathetic performances, and the dialogue is awful. Mia Farrow is the only thing in that movie worth a damn. An enjoyable movie? Maybe, but you would have to have really bad taste to take it seriously.
|
LeHah admitted himself not to have seen the remake, the script is all but word for word lifted from the original and anyone who takes horror films seriously needs to reassess their priorities in life frankly. Then again, I've had a look in that horror movie thread and you've listed a lot of shit as "good" horror so I can safely ignore your opinion on the subject.
There's nowhere I can't reach.