Nov 27, 2007, 03:13 AM
|
#1 of 127
|
Not to play devil's advocate, but there is one thing you all are forgetting to see. It's not his house being burglarized, it's his neighbor's. Now what i'm hoping he did was approach them with the shotgun and force them to stop, but perhaps they didn't do that and began to go and attack him, which forced him to shoot the shotgun. In THAT aspect, I see that as self-defense. However, if he fired that shotgun if those two were not getting ready to attack him, then I can't see that as justification for shooting them, despite them stealing from a neighbor's house. I don't see why if he had the control of the situation, just keep that shotgun on their heads as a fear tactic to make them stand still in fear of getting their heads blown off, I know I wouldn't fucking move if a boomstick was pointed at my poor head.
If anything, he should have went outside and tried to get a license plate and car description. I know it's not much, but the law could have easily taken care of those punks in that aspect.
Jam it back in, in the dark.
|
Karasu