 85242 |
 35212 |
|
|
||
|
|
|||||||
| Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis. |
|
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).
|
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
 Member 570 Level 40.69 Mar 2006 
|
For those who were excited by seeing the video, did you play Secret Rings? This looks just like it and I'm afraid that it'll be more of the same. The control scheme was pretty crummy along with the incredibly linear levels. I'll remain pretty skeptical about this one.
Jam it back in, in the dark. 
|
Member 570 Level 40.69 Mar 2006
|
There's nowhere I can't reach.
|
Member 570 Level 40.69 Mar 2006
|
Perhaps I should have stated this as a very precise question:
Who has played Sonic and the Secret Rings? If your answer to the above question was "I have," then please tell me what this game does to look promising. The concern is that say, in the first game, you could take a few different paths to the end, one perhaps going underground, the other through water. The last game they released gave you an option: Forwards or backwards. There's a "go" or "don't go" option. All you're doing is jumping along the track. I feel that this is going the same way in just giving the player a track to run on. I'll play an Olympics simulator for that. And no, the wolf crap doesn't bother me because people aren't crying over some magical genie book. What I will credit this short video is a time and score meter. At least some original aspects are being retained in the promise of a "back to basics" game. How ya doing, buddy?
|
Lukage