Gamingforce Interactive Forums
85242 35212

Go Back   Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis > Garrmondo Network > General Discussion
Register FAQ GFWiki Community Donate Arcade ChocoJournal Calendar

Notices

Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis.
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).


Wikipedia. So...how accurate is it?
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Solis
Wonderful Chocobo


Member 559

Level 20.83

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Nov 12, 2006, 05:24 PM Local time: Nov 12, 2006, 05:24 PM #1 of 50
As a general information source, Wikipedia works quite well. It's a very good resource for two main areas: the factual/well known subjects which are also covered by other encyclopedias, and for information about subjects that wouldn't have any comprehensive amount of data on them in any particular place otherwise.

For major topics like historical figures and basic principles and facts about a major subject, it does a very good job of providing facts and information at pretty much the same pace as a normal encyclopedia. And also, for subjects that otherwise wouldn't really get any attention in a normal encyclopedia (facts about a certain movie or game series, the history of a company, data about technologies, etc.), it's a nice resource when you wouldn't really be able to easily find any information on those subjects anywhere else. For those topics, about the only other place you'd find data on them would be random websites dedicated to those particular subjects, but often they aren't as comprehensive as Wikipedia and sometimes are wrong more often than Wikipedia.

It's weakest when it comes to the more controversial subjects or highly debatable information, or about specific people. For those, there's a higher chance of having false or outdated information being posted and vandalism. But usually those are areas that aren't going to be covered by many other sources without being prone to bias or factual innacurracies as well, so it's a bit of a toss up since you'd just be kinda screwed in general if you're looking for research on those topics.

In general Wikipedia is a good source, especially since they almost always have links that cite their sources and usually give a warning before parts that may have innacuracies are don't cite where the information is from. Of course it's mainly just good to use as a starting point or to get a basic overline of a subject, and occasionally pages will be sabotaged (I've rarely seen that outside of the heated debatable subjects, though), but overall it's a good source that offers a large range of facts quickly.

Just remember that the information there is usually paraphrased to begin with, so there's not much point to taking specific quotes from it and referencing it directly when you can use the original source that's cited at the bottom of the page for it.

Jam it back in, in the dark.

Last edited by Solis; Nov 12, 2006 at 05:31 PM.
Reply


Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis > Garrmondo Network > General Discussion > Wikipedia. So...how accurate is it?

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.