Gamingforce Interactive Forums
85240 35212

Go Back   Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis > Garrmondo Entertainment > Media Centre
Register FAQ GFWiki Community Donate Arcade ChocoJournal Calendar

Notices

Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis.
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).


[Movie] Star Trek (2009)
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Cyrus XIII
Good Chocobo


Member 554

Level 17.68

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old May 6, 2009, 06:58 PM Local time: May 7, 2009, 12:58 AM #1 of 151
Ugh, space anomalies - would you like a little holo deck plot with that?

Anyway, I just got home from the movies and I'd say they made a very decent film. Obviously, It's still all very fresh and a bit of a blur; those early reviews noting the relentless pace were spot on. But even with the SFX going through the roof, it still somehow manages to focus on all those classic characters, which the cast both portrays and innovates really well. Incidentally, the film also takes another familiar Trek plot device and actually does something interesting with it. Other than that, there isn't much in the way of aforementioned high-concept stuff, which for the purpose of rebooting the story and setting up the crew is probably a wise choice.

Still, you don't watch Star Trek for around twenty years and then come out of this without some nitpicking to do:

Spoiler:
  • A lot about the Romulans, especially the art design and their impromptu ascension from lowly miners to arch-baddies felt eerily reminiscent of the train-wreck that was Nemesis, as if the filmmakers wanted a do-over. Luckily it works a whole lot better this time.
  • Nimoy's Spock (dubbed "Spock Prime" in the credits) never quite reaches the same larger-than-live gravity he had in the older films.
  • Giacchino's delivers a decent score, but it gets a little too repetitive and overblown towards the end.
  • Red matter? Uhh...


Jam it back in, in the dark.

Last edited by Cyrus XIII; May 6, 2009 at 08:33 PM. Reason: typo
Cyrus XIII
Good Chocobo


Member 554

Level 17.68

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old May 10, 2009, 06:17 AM Local time: May 10, 2009, 12:17 PM #2 of 151
Spoiler:

Well, the idea with an alternate timeline is that it occurs beside the universe we know and love, so as soon as Nero went back in time, he entered universe B as opposed to universe A he had been living in. It's the Back to the Future explanation, where time is not linear, but radial.
Well, that's ONE theory, though that's the worst possible theory in my mind. I'm not thrilled with the idea of an entire 40-plus-year timeline being wiped out because Paramount wanted to make some more money off this franchise.
Spoiler:
That's time travel stories for you. I'm not really sure what's more believable, that Spock vanishes Marty McFly-style once Vulcan is gone or just lives on as a paradox. Messing with the timestream could also create a different, independent iteration of it, that is, if it was possible at all.


There's nowhere I can't reach.
Reply


Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis > Garrmondo Entertainment > Media Centre > [Movie] Star Trek (2009)

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[General Discussion] Don't Buy the Hype Bradylama Video Gaming 11 Feb 15, 2007 11:48 PM
Shining Force EXA Gechmir Video Gaming 20 Aug 4, 2006 07:27 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.