|
Originally Posted by VitaPup
The book for Wicked I didnt think was that good but I hear the play is amazing.
|
Yeah, the novel and the show are two really separate entities. A lot of the political intrigue and "adult content" was taken out for simplicity and marketability. The novel's auther once said that if
Wicked the novel were Wagner,
Wicked the musical would be Mozart. I kind of like that, actually--the novel tried
so hard to turn Oz--bright, sparkly, Judy Garland Oz--into a seedy cesspool of sin and corruption, and the musical balances that a bit.
I wish preteen girls would stay the heck away from the songs, though. I auditioned for my community theater's summer musical a month or so ago (it's
Seussical, so they encouraged little kids to try out) and of the nine or so people in my audition group, three people sang three different songs from
Wicked (one, a boy, sang a bootleg copy of "Defying Gravity" which labeled the singing character as "Dorothy.")
Despite being a huge theater geek, I've managed to avoid nearly all contact with
Phantom of the Opera beyond the (hideous) title song and the (rather pretty) "Music of the Night." I suppose I ought to get around to listening to it sooner or later, although Andrew Lloyd Webber is seen as a sort of Broadway Antichrist among the members of my family.
|
Originally Posted by wvlfpvp
Light in the Piazza *drool* srsly. It's some of the most gorgeous music that I've ever heard from broadway.
|
<3 <3 <3 Guettel ownz your face.
That's so cool, that you've gotten to do ambitious stuff like
Sweeney and
Parade. Were those amateur or professional productions? My community's amateur theatre favors "wholesome" entertainment like
Grease.
There's nowhere I can't reach.