Products of Creation Science

Originally Posted by The_Griffin

I really fucking hate myself for playing Devil's Advocate, but could you possibly link to the paper that you reviewed and the one you had published RR, and give any details you remember about the peer review process for both?

Sigh... I should stay out of this shit but I just want this fucking thread to die already.

Uh, I don't think he means scientific review of intelligent design specifically, but I think rather he is explaining the process of scientific peer review of the findings that is published in various science related periodicals.

Jam it back in, in the dark.

Originally Posted by Watts

Simple minded insults from a simple minded person.

How very sophisticated.

The historical example you presented takes a leap of logic here that does not exactly constitute evidence for your hypothesis when it comes to hidden agenda in my opinion.

There's nowhere I can't reach.