Do you believe in human evolution?

That’s odd, because from what I remember that evolution by natural selection has always been backed up by multidisciplinary science (such as astronomy and geology, and more directly in biology), but generally are disinterested actually proving evolution, but the evidence simply coincided.

The problem with creationism is simply that, it isn’t science. It is base on the claim of religious text from a specific religion. As a dogma, this claim simply does not subject itself to the self correcting mechanism to better understand the physical universe that of which we called the “Scientific method”. Perhaps it would further individual’s understanding of the “supernatural” or “spiritual” universe, but that has no bearing on science that should deal with the “natural” world. Further more, I personally think if creationism base on one religious dogma is given its run in school, we might as well put in the rest of them, like how the humanity is actually created by a Chinese Snake Goddess name Nuwa, or perhaps we go with Hinduism or certain Buddhist view of circular existence where beginning and end doesn’t actually exist and universe is an illusion.

Jam it back in, in the dark.

Do you think what constitute "science" is simply a matter of opinion?

There's nowhere I can't reach.

Quote:

Look, all I'm saying is that there are known-knowns, known-unknowns and unknown-unknowns-- Things we don't even know that we don't know.

-Samuel L. "Bad Mother Fucker" Jackson

Duo Maxwell: I thought that was Donald Rumsfeld.

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.