|
Originally Posted by Kolba
Have you tried Majora's Mask? The gameplay is a lot more varied and in-depth than the other games. This is why Majora's Mask has its haters, because it dared to try something new and interesting, when all the fans just wanted a dumb plug and play extension to OoT.
|
Agreed. I never completed Majora's Mask, but I'm personally seeking the game out (probably the collector's version for gamecube) to do so. Ocarina of Time was great fun, that had atmosphere and a pretty solid feel, but people just don't like to see their favorite game have a sequel because their standards are so fucking high, they won't approve of it regardless if it's a good game.
|
Originally Posted by Skexis
Street Fighter III is no friend of mine. The changes made from Alpha 3 were almost all for the worse, but the absolute worst feature about this game is the infuriating blocking system. It causes a lot of standoffs, sniping, and turtling, encouraging players who never really take risks.
|
Wait, does this guy actually think Capcom based SFIII off Alpha 3? The Alpha series are an entirely different take on Street Fighter. They're not supposed to be alike at all. Street Fighter III is actually quite in depth, with the parry system and characters like Remy, who feel like Guile with his moves. Or Necro feeling like Dhalsim. Or Hugo feeling like Zangief. I think this was done deliberate so people could relate with what their previously played characters in II were.
|
Originally Posted by devilmaycry
Einhänder (PSX): Recently looking for a PSX shmup to download and play on ePSXe I was led to belive by many that this was the best shooter in this platform... well I should've known that this would be no good since it was a Square game but I got it anyway. Guess what? It's Square alright, I've wasted 450 Mb of bandwidth on pure rubbish.
|
|
Originally Posted by devilmaycry
Panzer Dragoon Orta (and Panzer Dragoon 1)
|
|
Originally Posted by devilmaycry
|
Originally Posted by xsabin
nintendo games,the nintendo games are all boring and dont bring any fun to me,sega is much better
|
I second this dude's opinion, Nintendo is just ... argh!
|
Boy you sure do have extremely bad taste.
|
Originally Posted by devilmaycry
A quick glace through my common sense tells me this is yet another Square game, hyped up graphics (zOMG! a shmup with 3D graphics!), music (zOMG! stylish electronica music!), and some pre-rendered FMV showing intense battle.
Yet when you go play it guess what? It play like crap, that checkpoint system is just plain stupid, the weapons upgrades are a snore and the controls are just downright confusing. But forget about this all, it has pretty graphics and Square brand stamped on the face.
|
Oh shit son, Square made a game that isn't an RPG. It must fail miserably and be glared apon because of this very reason.
First of all, Einhander certainly isn't the only shmup with 3D graphics. Most games don't even need 3D graphics to be good, but Einhander wouldn't feel the same. Secondly, the music was very fitting to the game. Unless you played this game back in the age of the PS1, it really isn't going to have the same feeling as it is today. The game didn't age well like other titles (like the original Soul Calibur, for example) but it was definitely one of those games that went under the radar during it's time.
Considering you downloaded it, I'll just assume you didn't play it during it's time.
I haven't played through Einhander to the finish, nor do I intend to, but it isn't a bad game. If you're going to judge a game based on the company it's made by, that's just retarded. Shut up and stop complaining about your 450mb CD-R.
There's nowhere I can't reach.