Is this even a contest? SF is so much better. It has tons more depth. My opinion is summarized in the following two quotes:
|
Originally Posted by TheFrenchLlama
I voted SF... probably because I play fighting games more competively than anyone on this board. I normally look for how tournament worthy games are... and the MK games don't fall into this category. Fun, yes (ignoring the later installments with two button infinites and the like), but not really tournament worthy. There isn't much of a community for the MK scene, which says a lot. SF has stood the test of time (so far) as far as being competitive, which, in my eyes, makes it a superior series. No game is perfect, but I feel like SF comes out on top.
|
|
Originally Posted by Tellurian
Street Fighter is the _much_ stronger franchise.
It also has the better games.
Not to say that the Mortal Kombat franchise is a bad one.
To make a movie analogy, where Street Fighter is the Hollywood blockbuster, Mortal Kombat is the back-row splatter movie (with all the ups and downs that come with it though, cultish followers included).
|
Also, Havoc has apparently never played Street Fighter.
|
Originally Posted by CryHavoc
Totally agreed manny. Capcom is very bad away from Rival Schools, which is innovative. All street fighter is is a bunch of Ryu clones, and when they're not get this : they're KEN clones, who's already a ryu clone. Not enough cloning variety? Clone the evil ! CLone Akuma ! Who's just a Ken clone with one more move !! WOW.>!! Evil RYU FTW !.. not...
|
Double Post:
|
Originally Posted by Kurado
Actually, that's not true. Take a peek at SF3 (which should've arrived at or around the same time MK4 did). New sprites for the Shotokan bitches, along with every character. Learn2bash.
|
Also, in SF3: Ken > Akuma > Ryu >>>>> Sean
Jam it back in, in the dark.
85242
35212
Mucknuggle