|
Well unless I see conclusive proof, I cant believe this.
...
I cant do those double blind tests, because I naturally got rid of the 192k and replaced them with the new 320k. But if I ever get the chance again I will compare some files, just for the hell of it.
|
So rip and encode again. The only way you're going to get your proof is with a double-blind. If you don't have the original anymore (or you're too busy or something), I can select a track from my CD collection and prepare your test files for you. Take about 5 or 10 minutes, plus transfer time.
In the meantime, please drop this. It's been explained several times now why "more data to play with" is irrelevant--it's just not getting through to you I guess. I realize that you don't understand, and I wish there was a way that we could say it differently so that you would get it, but I'd hate for you to give someone else the wrong idea about all of this just because you haven't heard the proof.
Jam it back in, in the dark.