 85242 |
 35212 |
|
|
||
|
|
|||||||
| Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis. |
|
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).
|
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
 Member 516 Level 36.18 Mar 2006 
|
I'm confused by this discussion. I thought the Nintendo DS was the successor to the Gameboy Advance? I'm totally baffled here. I didn't really expect a new gameboy; in my eyes the DS is the new Gameboy. Why would someone have to announce that there wouldn't be a new Gameboy.
Jam it back in, in the dark. |
Member 516 Level 36.18 Mar 2006
|
Nintendo is retarded for pretending like the DS isn't the new Gameboy. Just like Gameboy Color could play regular Gameboy games, just like Gameboy Advance could play Gameboy Color games, the DS can play Gameboy Advance games and its own games as well, and it's only logical to conclude the DS is the new Gameboy. Now, if they Gameboy Advance and DS had come out simultaneously or nearly so, then I could believe that the DS was not meant to be the successor... But come on.
This is the same as Nintendo trying to play like the Gamecube and Wii are to be side by side. If there's some kind of backwards compatibility implemented then it's the successor whether you say so or not. And like I said, it makes no sense to announce that there would be no new Gameboy. How could a new Gameboy be separate-but-equal to the DS? Coming soon: "Hey guys, by the way, there's not going to be a SNES." There's nowhere I can't reach. |
Eleo