Brain-damaged woman sued by Wal-Mart

Need I remind you, Skills, that morality and legality are not the same? Nobody's debating the legal process here. But saying "shit sucks, get on with your life" isn't a whole lot better than the LOL BOYCOTT reaction. What will probably ensue from this publicity is the possibility of the family getting volunteer donations, and that's a good thing.

Jam it back in, in the dark.

Originally Posted by Colonel Spreadsheet

You smell like pickles. >=(

Well, I hope one day you get brain-damaged in an accident while washing a pair of pants and Wal-Mart sues you for the compensation money AND the pants.

There's nowhere I can't reach.

Yeah and we should also euthanize brain damaged people because they're a drain on our resources, I mean nobody really gives a shit about them anyway

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.

Just stop posting because nobody actually cares about your opinion and you're just wasting your time

Everyone on the internet is probably laughing at you too

I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body?

Originally Posted by LeHah

I mean - what does a brain damaged person give back to society?

I dunno, maybe they can stock shelves in Wal-Mart.... ?

Originally Posted by LeHah

The difference here is that I don't put on airs to any of that. I don't give a shit about people I don't know. Why? Because this world would be a hell of a lot better off if we cared about people we knew instead of pretending to care about people we don't.

Oh yeah, now you're being all "real", huh? People can comment on concepts as they see fit. I certainly don't give a shit about you*, but I can damn well post about how you're a douchebag because you're trying to one-up everyone on e-cynicism. Or rather, instead of just condemning people for their opinion, you've assumed a lofty position from which you can condemn people for the very act of offering an opinion.

It's like going into a filesharing forum and telling them that filesharing is bad, and acting like some internet hero because you've reported someone to the RIAA.

*in the sense that I wouldn't be donning a black avatar to mourn an untimely demise

Most amazing jew boots

Re-read my post, I'm all for calling bad opinions stupid. But I'm against limiting the admissibility of opinions based on degree of connection, which you're doing a lot of since it gives you more targets.

Now try again.

How ya doing, buddy?

No, I'm talking about this whole spiel about "armchair critics". You can basically go into every argument and apply a similar line of reasoning -- and spin it in whatever possible way to give it validity -- but it doesn't contribute a damned thing to the discussion, which means it's irrelevant and disruptive.

FELIPE NO