 85242 |
 35212 |
|
|
||
|
|
|||||||
| Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis. |
|
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).
|
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
 Member 461 Level 25.17 Mar 2006 
|
Line-in recording better through Audigy or X-Fi? XP or Vista? 44.1KHz or 48KHz?
(I tried to search; if this has already been asked somewhere, sorry)
I've been considering making some high(er)-quality recordings of songs which aren't available in good quality (a few Zelda TP songs come to mind). I haven't bothered with line-in recordings in a while, so I was wondering if anyone else knew: Do any X-Fi cards have any noticeable quality advantages over the Audigy 2 ZS for line-in recording? Would it be better to record in Vista x64 (assuming I can find recording software I can stand to use) or XP? No difference despite differences in handling audio? And would it be better to do the recording in 44.1KHz or 48KHz? I've heard elsewhere that the Audigy 2 ZS natively converts audio to 48KHz, maybe even poorly? I've also heard the X-Fi's don't suffer this quality degradation, but for the Audigy 2, should I tell my software to record in 44.1KHz or 48KHz? Thanks in advance. Jam it back in, in the dark. |
neothe0ne