 85242 |
 35212 |
|
|
||
|
|
|||||||
| Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis. |
|
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).
|
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
 Member 4590 Level 13.98 Apr 2006 
|
As far as first person shooters go (CounterStrike
 Source) or Day of Defeat: Source, games I play. Usually people are only commenting on bogus things that happened like a headshot, or a knife kill, or getting spray 'n prayed (mostly to CS:S, which coined that term?) where the opposing player holds the trigger down on their weapon hoping one of the stray bullets nails their head or other luck. There is plenty of accusing of hackers in CS:S which usually goes something like:Accuser: Redhat is fucking hacking! He got 3 headshots in a row through the wall! The accused: I'm not hacking you dolt. Accuser: HACKER! Admin: Wut? Accuser: HACKER! Admin: Alright, I know you well here so OFF WITH HIS HEAD! Accused: WHAT NO! If there is a hacker, some people go out of their way to say how despicable the person is. Like how they nothing better to do, etc. Everynow and then when I played DoD:S people would get into arguments about WWII or about the world leaders at that time. They are usually pretty dumb arguments, with one totally obnoxious guy usually. I've seen this chat take place maybe about 4 times. Maybe it says something about players talking about what the game is based on. Most amazing jew boots  In your dreams, magical thoughts All things are real, unless you dream they're not
Last edited by Aquas; Nov 20, 2006 at 03:06 PM.
|
Aquas