Hey, that's funny! I was just reading about a report by some economists saying that dealing with global warming was a bad idea!
|
Quote:
Sure, agriculture would be negatively effected, but then [striek]having to eat[/strike] farming is really just a small part of America's GDP. Plus, summer tourism could last longer!
Sure millions might die due to changing weather patterns, stavation, and flooding, but that's still cheaper than fixing anything. Why? People that live on <$1 have a low "willingness to pay" for solutions, because they can't pay jack shit. So their deaths are cheaper than retrofitting the economy
|
---
As regards climate change debates, you know why so many of the anti-climate-change people turn out to be shell agencies with official-sounding names, parroting old and countered arguments? Some big industries took a page out of the tobacco playbook: create enough "argument" among "experts" in the public domain so that things will appear ambiguous. In ambiguity, the American people will prefer to do nothing.
Most amazing jew boots
85242
35212
How Unfortunate