Gamingforce Interactive Forums
85242 35212

Go Back   Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis > Garrmondo Network > Help Desk
Register FAQ GFWiki Community Donate Arcade ChocoJournal Calendar

Notices

Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis.
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).


Sound Card = 40% more FPS!!!
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Cetra
oh shi-


Member 445

Level 24.23

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Mar 9, 2006, 01:17 PM Local time: Mar 9, 2006, 10:17 AM #1 of 38
Well if the game was somehow using software 5.1+ digital decoding for its sound (Doom 3 engine can do this for example) then I could easily see an increase of that much by moving that sound decoding to a hardware accelerator like the X-Fi. Unfortunately for Creative, most engines don't even offer software digital decoding.

Jam it back in, in the dark.
Cetra
oh shi-


Member 445

Level 24.23

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Mar 10, 2006, 09:37 PM Local time: Mar 10, 2006, 06:37 PM #2 of 38
Originally Posted by www.sega.co.jp
Actually the only flaw of onboard sound is CPU usage. But considering most PCs over 1GHz can more than handle any form of playback, the issue isn't so much game speed increase, but features.
The only flaw happens to be the harshest flaw. 5% of a 2Ghz processor is actually a huge waste of resources. Think about it in reverse. A 5% overclock can result in a 10-20FPS increase in performance depending on your stock clock rate. If you are hovering near 100% CPU utilization, that 5% could mean the difference between a playable and non-playable experience.

There's nowhere I can't reach.
Cetra
oh shi-


Member 445

Level 24.23

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Mar 12, 2006, 02:39 AM Local time: Mar 11, 2006, 11:39 PM #3 of 38
Originally Posted by www.sega.co.jp
Yeah, well that's 5% usage on a 700MHz CPU, on a 2GHz or higher, it's probably lower than 1%. Remember though, also keep in CPU usage tests they do for soundcards do things that you'd probably never try on a PC (like playing back 32 wav files at the same time).
How about decoding a 5.1 digital signal? Using a software decoder like ffdshow (the audio channel obviously) takes 7% of my CPU time with a 3.2 Ghz P4 with HT.

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.
Cetra
oh shi-


Member 445

Level 24.23

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Mar 12, 2006, 06:50 PM Local time: Mar 12, 2006, 03:50 PM #4 of 38
Yeah, I'm going to go with the fact that most of you don't own an X-Fi as well. I had an Envy24 (Revolution 7.1) and replaced it with an X-Fi and it easily sounds as good. Plus I get the added bonus of EAX and accelerated voices with the X-Fi. Plus the stereo upmixing higher quality in the X-Fi than pretty much anything you could find under $5,000.

Maybe some of you should read some of the X-Fi reviews. Most people agree they are a huge step up from the Audigy cards.

I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body?

Last edited by Cetra; Mar 12, 2006 at 07:14 PM.
Cetra
oh shi-


Member 445

Level 24.23

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Mar 12, 2006, 08:19 PM Local time: Mar 12, 2006, 05:19 PM #5 of 38
Originally Posted by Arainach
That "Huge Step Up" is a bunch of resampling 'crystallization' bullshit that I consider a negative rather than a positive. I'll stick to my original music, kthx.
Crystallization is an option, and it isn't even a resampling method. It reshapes the sound output waveform without resampling. It's more like a hardware equalizer. I love how you play it off without even hearing it though as it does an really nice job in increasing the sound quality of pretty much every lossy format out there. But of course, you can turn it off, and with the X-Fi get an untouched audio stream since it doesn't internally resample anything. Not only that, but the physical layout of the X-Fi chip is a ring, so if you decide to turn any of the 'features' off, the sound data doesn't even have to pass though the given hardware.

But, anyway the major step up from the Audigy cards is the X-Fi does not internally resample to 48 kHz. It also offers a much higher quality DAC converter and a better signal-to-noise ratio than any non-professional sound card out there. But of course I'm sure you knew all of this. Actually, I guess you didn't as you won't be making such asinine comments if you did.

I was speaking idiomatically.

Last edited by Cetra; Mar 12, 2006 at 08:29 PM.
Cetra
oh shi-


Member 445

Level 24.23

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Mar 12, 2006, 08:26 PM Local time: Mar 12, 2006, 05:26 PM #6 of 38
Originally Posted by RacinReaver
FIREFOX IS STILL BETTER

REFORMAT

USE LINUX!@!!!
Thanks for putting exactly what I was thinking in better words. :P

What kind of toxic man-thing is happening now?
Reply


Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis > Garrmondo Network > Help Desk > Sound Card = 40% more FPS!!!

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[DS] Universal DS Homebrew thread. Fucking cheapskates. Elixir Video Gaming 514 Oct 20, 2009 03:15 PM
[News] Iwata Asks Interview Regarding Wii Fit's Sound Design trackjacket General Game Music Discussion 1 Feb 24, 2008 05:27 PM
Sound Card problems LivingDreams Help Desk 2 Mar 18, 2006 10:39 PM
New spoiler method. Bigblah Board Support 76 Mar 15, 2006 11:41 AM
Card advice. Capture and Sound Angelic Diablos Help Desk 0 Mar 11, 2006 10:48 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.