|
You confuse science with think tanks. There is no great debate in the scientific world; the vast majority of minds and the overwhelming majority of evidence points in one direction.
|
True, but Radez has a good point if we take the censorship and manipulation of the media into account.
The scientific method is only good for understanding what's going on now. Philosophy is guiding our knowledge of the future based on what we know from the past.
To be honest, I'm more worried about what's going to happen when the magnetic poles of Earth switch again. Apparently we're 150,000 years overdue. What would be even worse is if we have an explosion of methane gas that escapes from pockets at the bottom of the ocean. Once ignited it would wipe out everything on the surface within seconds and create a "nuclear" winter. Or how about when that meteor might hit the Earth when it "passes by" in the next 10 years or so. It's all happened before!
Sadly, nothing in life lasts forever. Not even our planet.
Jam it back in, in the dark.