|
||
|
|
|||||||
| Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis. |
|
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Well technically it is wider than the limit allows for images, and it depends how hard and fast they're going to stick to that. Easily cropped to fit the allowed dimensions though if need be.
How ya doing, buddy? |
|
Well it's not wider anymore, it's actually 50 pixels less than the maximum width allowed for a sig. But true, I can't see any reason why someone would have been bothered by the 592 wide version, but you get some funny people out there.
This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it. |
^ What Q said.
I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body? |
"Huge minority", oxymoron-tastic. XD
Why do I suddenly feel bad for having a big sig pic. Damn you Shin. I was speaking idiomatically. |
Shin: Firefox + Adblock will solve your image problems. Just right-click and select 'Adblock image' and it disappears from the page.
Also, I love that people are throwing around this idea of people having an option that allows them to only show sigs that are a certain size and under. Exactly how do you plan to do that? My sig pic is linked from my image host and therefore there's no real way of vBulletin knowing what size any image is in it. So the easy way around any such restriction would be to host your image externally rather than in ChocoSig. The simple solution, though, is as above. Firefox + Adblock. What kind of toxic man-thing is happening now? |
It might be possible to do some sort of initial check, but then it depends on how the image is hosted and loaded. If you right-click my images and do 'Properties' you'll most likely see that it says "size unknown". This is because I use some funky scripting to display images from my image host and adds further complication to such an idea.
Don't get me wrong, it's a great idea in terms of "Wouldn't it be nice if...", but it's just not practical, or necessarily feasible either. As for options for enabling/disabling avatar and signature displays I thought we already had those, or were the lost in the Great Board Reset of 1706? How ya doing, buddy? |
What, you don't want my bikini-clad body? |
I thought there was less need to do so now we have automatic checking or something. Or is that only for people submitting sigs from now on (I guess).
Good that you guys are keeping an eye out either way. Jam it back in, in the dark. |