Gamingforce Interactive Forums
85242 35212

Go Back   Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis > Garrmondo Entertainment > Video Gaming
Register FAQ GFWiki Community Donate Arcade ChocoJournal Calendar

Notices

Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis.
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).


[General Discussion] Video game review reform idea.
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Dopefish
I am becoming a turkey.


Member 42

Level 42.28

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Nov 3, 2006, 10:55 PM #1 of 25
Video game review reform idea.

I was thinking about this for a few days, and I came to the conclusion that video games are a little too conservatively reviewed. Here's what I was thinking: for any successive game in a series (ex: Madden, or GTA), if it isn't a significant improvement from the predecessor (graphically or gameplay-wise, like GTA3 was to GTA2) then there should be a half-point deduction for each successive game (so, by the time San Andreas came out it should have had a full point deduction levied against it). This way, video game reviewers could be more responsible for recommending games.

(Note: I realize how useless most video game reviews are. Most gamers are smart enough to get their reviews from multiple sources. Still, I don't think game companies should be able to get away with sequels that are virtually the same every year. Would people have gotten the next Mario or Zelda or Metroid games if they stayed virtually the same each year? How about Sonic, or Crash Bandicoot? Or Jak and Daxter? Or, dare I say it, Halo? Those 5 series are just an example of series that more or less stayed the same each iteration. Maybe I'm alone on this, I don't know.)

Jam it back in, in the dark.

Dopefish
I am becoming a turkey.


Member 42

Level 42.28

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Nov 3, 2006, 11:22 PM #2 of 25
Maybe I'm an idealist. Part of me thinks someday video game reviewers will be played up like film critics.

There's nowhere I can't reach.

Dopefish
I am becoming a turkey.


Member 42

Level 42.28

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Nov 4, 2006, 10:38 AM #3 of 25
I just think that video games should evolve more often than they shouldn't. How often to great games really come out? Yeah, OK, those games shouldn't be bothered with much. I just think of Nintendo and how their games had evolved almost every single iteration (think Mario, Zelda) and since the N64 Mario has stayed mostly the same, Zelda has stayed mostly the same and Metroid doesn't look like it'll be changing much.

Like I said, I'm an idealist. There's really no expectation that this will happen, but it's not without hope.

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.

Dopefish
I am becoming a turkey.


Member 42

Level 42.28

Mar 2006


Reply With Quote
Old Nov 5, 2006, 10:08 AM #4 of 25
GTA3 deserves its 10 rating. Nothing is more revolutionary than a game others copy.

Most amazing jew boots

Reply


Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis > Garrmondo Entertainment > Video Gaming > [General Discussion] Video game review reform idea.

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.