HAY GUYS

Misogynyst Gynecologist · 10:23 AM

Originally Posted by Furby

It looks damn amazing from the trailer. But if they bring in Silver Surfer does that mean that they will bring in...*tries to remember the name of silver surfer's master*... And make a 3rd movie??

I think the subtitle from the movie is taken from the two part story from Fantastic Four #48 through #50, where the Fantastic Four fight the Silver Surfer and eventually join forces to stop Galactus from devouring the planet. Richards eventually drives off Galactus by threatening to use the Ultimate Nullifier (we find out almost 40 years later than the item is in fact part of Galactus, but we're not given any facts or truth on that)

In the movie, Galactus will be completely CGI and a voice actor has not been named as yet.

And you're right - the first movie was incredibly bad. And it will be very difficult to bring such a beloved story to the big screen - but I relish the remote possibility that the movie will somehow turn out good. This is one of those truely great "epics" Marvel produced in it's heyday.

Jam it back in, in the dark.

Misogynyst Gynecologist · Dec 28, 2006, 05:33 PM

Originally Posted by Domino

I don't know the back story to the Silver Surfer

Im going on memory here...

Noran Radd was the lone survivor of a planet Galactus devoured. Galactus, seeing potential in the man, bestowed upon him the Power Cosmic and gave him the assignment of being the Harbinger Of Galactus. The Surfer would find a planet full of life for Galactus to absorb, but when the Surfer found a kindred spirit in Earthlings, he turned on his maker.

Instead of destroying him, Galactus damned him to Earth. If the Surfer ever left, an impentreable shield of fire and rock would block the Surfer from leaving. (This shield was later removed, allowing the Surfer to leave Earth)

There's nowhere I can't reach.

Misogynyst Gynecologist · Jan 2, 2007, 10:53 PM

Originally Posted by The Wise Vivi

Ok, call me stupid, but I had no idea the Silver Surfer was a bad guy.

He was at first; more "guilty by association" than actually being evil like his master, though.

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.

Misogynyst Gynecologist · Jan 2, 2007, 11:29 PM

Originally Posted by Tomzilla

While his insatiable hunger has brought about the destruction of millions of worlds, he is a natural aspect of the universe.

While the whole "natural aspect of the universe" crap was only brought in of late, you are correct in saying he isn't nessessarily evil, simply an antogonist.

I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body?