|
Originally Posted by Tawnee Van Pelt
When I mentioned "Your America" I thought it was implied that I was making a generalization.
|
Which is exactly the problem. You're being a complete idiot
on purpose by making rash generalizations since you have nothing to say about the specifics. "Look at me rage against the machine!" doesn't go over well with people who graduated high school.
Not to mention - people who cry foul always play that "I thought it was implied". Stop that. Implying anything over the internet is stupid to begin with - as it's very easy to misconstrue. On top of that, this bullshit that you were attempting to be subtle by implying something is just a bad cover-up for you not being willing to explain yourself. "Oh! I thought you would get it!" is stupid and childish and you need to bring more to a discussion than hollow, half-witted perceptions.
|
Originally Posted by Tawnee Van Pelt
As always, a flame is easier than actually contributing to the thread.
|
So don't make terrible threads that have no substance? I mean, you bitch about Hugo Chavez not making it to the cover of TIME. Okay, thats nice. Make me care. Did you even attempt that? No. You just said "OH ISNT IT IRONIC THAT CHAVEZ WAS TAKEN OFF THE MAGAZINE COVER AND REPLACED BY THE INTERNET POPULACE"
Do you even know what you're talking about?
|
Originally Posted by Tawnee Van Pelt
This isn't about your "news system" it's about the irony of how Time dissapeared Chavez from the cover but at the same time put on the cover to the people, it's called Social Networking man, read about it.
|
You obviously have no idea what the hell "irony" means, if you're attempting to shoehorn it into that sentence.
As for your nonsense of "social networking", leave the empty buzz words to Access Hollywood and try to give your post some plausibility by explaining yourself with words instead of simply throwing everything at the wall to see what sticks.
There's nowhere I can't reach.