love me

Member 3476

Level 53.02

Mar 2006

|
Aug 3, 2011, 07:35 PM
Local time: Aug 4, 2011, 10:35 AM
|
#1 of 14
|
Yikes, good luck with something like this. I've gotta say, I have two doubts, the most primary of which being participation. I honestly don't know if you'd get too many responses, since like you said that project in the past kind of failed and that was done in the days where GFF was a really active place.
The second doubt links directly to the first---compiling a list of 50-300 tracks sound exceptionally painstaking and difficult, at least to me, and would likely discourage people from participating. Particularly given how much VGM we're all familiar with. For the previous project it was much simpler since you just had to list soundtracks.
Having said that I would probably still construct a list for you, though I'm not sure how many people would, and if it would make the project worthwhile. I reckon cutting down the lists is the first point of call; something like 32 tracks for every person would be infinitely more manageable for both the participants and you, the one calculating the results. With 32 tracks you could have the point groups separated as such: first track; second track; 3-8; 9-16; 17-32. :bigshrug:
Finally, it wouldn't at all be weird for you to run this, for the record!
Jam it back in, in the dark.
|