|
Originally Posted by Elixir
NO other company has milked their characters as much as Nintendo.
|
What other gaming companies have been around just as long as Nintendo and have a mascot?
Twas what I thought.
So what? Do you think they're going to make a new soccer game and put random characters in it? No, they're going to put Nintendo characters in it. Big deal. Everybody knows who the Nintendo characters are. That's why they do it.
It's not milking, it's familiarity.
Double Post:
|
Originally Posted by Elixir
Are you seriously trying to say that RPGs are a borrowed idea from the tamagotchi? Because that's what you're implying. RPGs don't count simply because there are only a very small portion of RPGs which let you raise animals. Nintendogs is a borrowed idea and is nothing original. It doesn't matter how popular it is, it's an advanced tamagotchi simulator.
There's always Animal Crossing, but nobody but myself probably would of thought of that considering it's a Nintendo release. See how biased this is?
|
When did I imply that? Did you not read my post?
I didn't say RPGs or animals. I said a DOG.
I never denied that it was an advanced tamagotchi simulator. I said "There's lots of skyscrapers but only one Empire State Building." Meaning, there's lots of games in a genre, but only a few that stand out.
RPGs are just an advanced ripoff of Akalabeth or Adventure.
WHAT NOW?
Thank you for taking everything out of context and being a fucktard. It's appreciated.
Thank you for letting all of us know that you can read.
Thank you for drawing your own conclusions as to what people say.
Thank you for ignoring everybody's points.
Thank you for continuing this arguement based on what you think I say.
Thank you so much.
This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.