Being yourself? or just acting like you are in order to fit in?

As the ending to Evangelion implies:

Spoiler:

'Nuff said.

Jam it back in, in the dark.

What, you couldn't tell?

I could analyze your post and find the obvious flaws to your argument, but you're not worthy of the time, honestly.

There's nowhere I can't reach.

To avoid being all philosophical and running all my own arguments into piles of shit I'll simply state what I believe in:

The very act of acting differently towards different people is completely natural. These are all parts of who you are, because you are defined by your actions. You probably act differently towards your parents than you do towards your close friends, and certainly much different towards strangers. But all of which still define who you are, therefore, you is a dynamic variable with no set boundaries. There is no set definition of who you are, because no one truly knows. Sure, you may know what you are right now, but right at this very second that person you are is now a person you used to be, for time is always continuing ever so slowly... And you eventually will forget many of the actions that used to be you; but that doesn't mean they aren't you, because everything you are is composed of in the past. Over the course of your lifetime you are consistently composing yourself to be (hopefully) a better version of you. It is only after you die that what you are, in the sense of this lifetime, is a constant.

However, if you compose yourself with actions that are contrary to who you are, the very fact that you did this becomes who you are because a large part of who you are is whether your actions are constant with each other. Acting only involves what other people see your actions are composed of. Actions, on the other hand, is broader; they compose of the things that not only other people see, but the actions only you see, the most important of all being thought. If your acting and your actions become contradictions, you become a contradiction, and you will come to eventually loathe yourself if this conflict of self-interest does not end.

I'll put these two paragraphs into two sentences:

It is impossible to not be yourself, but it is possible to contradict yourself. They have a term for these kinds of people: inconsistent.

So what Sass sees in herself as being stubborn I see as being consistent and self-loving. And I actually admire her for that.

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.