|
||
|
|
|||||||
| Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis. |
|
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Internet Explorer 7
So I hear IE7 for WinXP is out, and its a very poor program with some very annoying bugs (most have to do things with slow sites or slow browsing speed, in which case it just cuts loading in half, resulting in broken images when browsing 4chan and thats pretty much it).
Browser wise its ie6 with an UI tweak, tabs, transparent PNG, many bugfixes and minor CSS improvements. But, it has exceptionally good security (pretty much no recent vulnerability were affected by it in the past half year while it was being developed), possibly due to the fact that by installing IE7, IE is seperated from the Windows Kernel. Gotta give Microsoft some props for that, even though the browser feels like its from 2002. Oya, and it will be put up on Autoupdate as a critical security update (which it is, ironically) from November. I can sympathize with that, and since it also has slightly improved CSS and transparent png support, this is a well needed forward move for the web. Forcing this on users is a justified evil since Microsoft is cleaning up 5 years of mess they created. So, I wonder, what does GFF think about this? Jam it back in, in the dark. |
And yea its nothing mindblowing - its how a browser should've looked in 2002. There's nowhere I can't reach. |
The security thing isn't air talk either, for example no previous IE based exploit affected IE7 at all, during the beta phase. And just think about it - with 3 major browsers around (IE6, IE7, FF) around, all with different security buildups, threats will be more scarce then they are now. It's much more rewarding to search for exploits when a browser is used by 80% of the visitors, but after the automatic updates take place, that number will surely decrease. More diversity among browsers will cause less threats to appear for one browser from the many, thats common logic. Plus at least theres an actual developement team on IE, not just a hotfix team.
This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.
Last edited by evilboris; Oct 22, 2006 at 09:37 PM.
|
Someone at the IEblog summarized it up the best:
I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body? |
Did Firefox and Opera got perfect support for all w3c standards in 1 year flat after their release? Of course not. They incrementally added features till everything was supported. IE seems to move in that direction too. I was speaking idiomatically. |
What kind of toxic man-thing is happening now? |
I dunno, the fact that they STARTED developing IE after 5 years of hiatus, slowly pluggin up its bugs, leading to wider adoption of standards (the few of the ones they fixed), is kinda good. Remember that IE still has ~80% market share, so any new developement for it will have a global effect especially since they plan are distributing it via Windows Update.
I'm not saying that you should kiss Microsofts ass because they added tabs to IE in 1 year. Firefox zealots will not use IE even if it will have way better standards support (remember the first browser wars? IE outperformed Netscape in that field back then). FELIPE NO |