|
Jesus, it's not a one-shot deal.
You must have no concept of the shear magnitude of time and space if you believe something like this can't occur apart from supernatural intervention. Either that, or you really haven't studied probability.
|
No. I just believe that when examining the origin of life, time and space becomes limited to a very small window of opportunity through certain evidence. The half life of Ribose Sugar is one small example. (53min at 20 degrees celcius. Ribose sugar is required to make both RNA and DNA)
The issue I have with the Big Bang theory is one of deferred causality. The idea that the big bang had to come from somewhere. Something had to create it. Recall that matter is neither created nor destroyed.
Something coming from nothing without cause, much like life from nonlife seems like a convenient exception from nature's laws.
Devo. Why do scientists insist on an atheistic worldview when discussing their research? Neither can be proven or disproven through the scientific method. I personally see nothing wrong with discussing theism and atheism with children and letting them make up their own minds.
Honestly, I don't know that I can even debate on I.D. See, I don't live in this little bubble you people call the United States of America and as a result, I am detached from the political issues in that country. Honestly, in Canada, I.D. has never come up as a valid curriculum in any of our schools.
This is all I hope to contribute without getting dragged into a pointless debate for the hundredth time.
There's nowhere I can't reach.
85242
35212
Traumatized Rat