 85241 |
 35212 |
|
|
||
|
|
|||||||
| Welcome to the Exploding Garrmondo Weiner Interactive Swiss Army Penis. |
|
GFF is a community of gaming and music enthusiasts. We have a team of dedicated moderators, constant member-organized activities, and plenty of custom features, including our unique journal system. If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ or our GFWiki. You will have to register before you can post. Membership is completely free (and gets rid of the pesky advertisement unit underneath this message).
|
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Newbie
 Member 2857 Level 5.90 Mar 2006 
|
Who said life on other planets must follow the same laws of physics and whatnot that we follow? Maybe they don't even need water to have life? Who knows? Don't you think our scope of science as of today (although we call it advance and modern) COULD in fact be primitive and limited? There are so many things we can't explain, or we just don't know, and the scientists are all jumping at the "if there's water, there's possibly life!!" idea.
Maybe there can be neon-based life forms, or potassium-permanganate based life-forms, or ethereal life forms made of mass that doesn't even exist in our world that we can't comprehend out there. We all think we are so smart that everything in the universe must fit our definition of what is what. We don't know enough as humans to scientifically calculate these things out; we can only leave that up to our imaginations and ponder the possiblities... hmmm..... Most amazing jew boots |
|
Newbie
Member 2857 Level 5.90 Mar 2006
|
Some people just think whatever scientists throw at them is absolute and that's that. No it isnt! Perhaps some concrete science like meterology or human biology has weight to it, BUT NOT astrobiology (I didn't know there was such a thing; how silly). THink for yourself, imagine what happens when scientists are wrong even in those concrete sciences (which happened quite a few times in the past century alone). There's nowhere I can't reach. |
|
Newbie
Member 2857 Level 5.90 Mar 2006
|
Since we're both on the same page, don't you think astrobiology is sort of a silly science, as it is based purely on non-concrete evidence and theories and "what-ifs"? Some stuff in other sciences are sort of theoretical as well; but should everyone begin to make assumptions solely based on those?
Theoretical science, as it's title suggests, shouldn't be taken for truth. Unfortunately, many do. This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it. |
r[aV]el