Sex: Take It Or Leave It

Do I really need to answer this question? I personally think people who are indifferent to sex are either a) bad at it so they become self-conscious, or else b) the people they've been sleepin with are terrible at it, so they get put off it. Only logical possibilities.

Jam it back in, in the dark.

Sure, Tama, but I was assuming that people who have never had sex aren't going to launch into a tirade about how much they hate it.

There's nowhere I can't reach.

I suppose I should have put a big [/sarcasm] tag on the end of that post to make it more obvious for you there, SS?

This thing is sticky, and I don't like it. I don't appreciate it.

Not me. Being a good fuck is in my top 3 needs in a relationship. And if you don't enjoy it, you're not going to be good at it. Period. And anyone who argues "there are more important things", sure... but sex is up there. A relationship with bad or little to no sex is just friendship. I have lots of friends. I don't need one that takes up the majority of my time with no distinct benefits.

I am a dolphin, do you want me on your body?

Originally Posted by AliceNWondrland

Wow. That's exactly how this guy was that I dated. He was extremely touchy-feely-kissy, but when it came to sex - and it wasn't that he hated it - he just didn't really want it. Ever.

I wouldn't give up on having a relationship entirely, Soluzar, as long as you're realistic about the fact that it's going to be much more difficult to find someone who shares your attitude, which it sounds like you are. I'm quite certain that there are women out there who would be just as happy if they never had to bother with sex.

We call them Shin's ex-girlfriends.

Most amazing jew boots

Originally Posted by rocketdog

Was he an intellectual? I consider myself to be an intellectual person, and I also am uninterested in sex. Yes, I've had sex (over 200 times - 3 year girlfriend), but after we broke up, it sex just didn't seem logical.

Oh, son. I don't even know where to start here. First of all, sex has been a pursuit of the intellectual since the dawn of the intellectual. For every T.E. Lawrence (who I would argue simply expressed a secondary sexuality) there are a million Oscar Wildes and Miltons. Don't try and pawn this off as an intellectual pursuit, the intellectual is fascinated by the human condition. As a logician, maybe you have the basis of an argument, but please don't throw intellectual around because you read a book or two, and then act as if it has any bearing on the conversation at hand. If you want to argue an a priori stance about sexuality as necessity, please, be my guest, but I've seen nothing outside of you stating you're an intellectual that would even hint that you have a leg to stand on here. Seriously, mate. You're making yourself look bad.

What kind of toxic man-thing is happening now?

Originally Posted by BurningRanger

But, if you're going to go that far out of your way to make her happy, doesn't she owe it back to you as a respectful, understanding, and loving girlfriend to try and figure out what is wrong with herself?

"Thanks for loving me and treating me well and refuting, essentially, one of the core aspects of your manhood just to make me happy. In return I will make no attempts whatsoever to change myself to make you happier."

Am I wrong here?

Any man with a Shining Force II av, especially one that awesome, can never be wrong. Also, in this case, stunningly right. Relationships are give and take.

FELIPE NO